Shay ([info]telecart) wrote,
@ 2007-04-16 23:35:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current location:Dining in HELLLLLLL!!!!
Current music:Funkstroung

The anatomy of an idea
Just wanted to update with what's what..

* Finally finished my referat paper in "Kant's Critique of Pure Reason" entitled "The Roles of Analyticity: On the Synthetic-Analytic Distinction for Kant and others" in which I managed to squeeze into 14 pages 3 versions of Analyticity as they appear to me for Kant, Frege, The Vienna Circle, and Quine, with a little reference to Leibniz and Hume in the beginning too. The question being begged of course, is are these differences of analyticity between these thinkers conceptual differences, or do they agree on the concept, just not of it's extension? In either case, how does that affect Kant's work?
Interestingly, for the most severe criticism (that of Quine's Two Dogmas of Empiricism), Kant's work stands either way.
I didn't always think Kant's Copernican Revolution was so.. well, revolutionary til lI wrote this work. My personal intuitions lead towards a Dennettian version of strong Materialistic Empiricism, but it seems that Kant's work, from his point of view, is pretty much immune to criticism, and yet is anti-dogmatic by it's virtue.
Very powerful stuff, I've really finally come to newly appreciate Kant, for the sheer magnitude and depth of his project.

* Apparently, we're still on strike. I want to say how rotten this strike is, how retarded it is for students to go on strike, let alone when most of the students in the country don't even belong to the student body union, but honestly? I'm a lazy fuck, and I do enjoy some off time.

Ah, what the hell, let the ranting begin. This shit's tricky though, since, technically, I'm paying for these classes that aren't taking place. This is something the Stalinist authoritarian Student Union people probably didn't bother taking into account. You're not hurting anyone with capital when you go on strike! You're hurting me. Which is completely irrelevant, since they quite clearly state that they had no intention of helping me, but rather (at least they claim) future students, who are of course not my problem at all. I'm just being hijacked for the ride, which to be frank, is more probably related to the Student Body Union's director wanting a piece of the political pie. He doesn't want to be left out, because he's probably planning a future in politics, like several of his predecessors. Because seriously, who even wants to be a part of the SBU? Most students in Israel don't. I'm ashamed to say I'm a member, but for purely pragmatic selfish reasons; If I weren't I'd be denied certain rights. More than anything it was an expensive lottery ticket for the chance to be able to park my car on campus, who the University authorities gave the monopoly to the SBU for some unfair reason or another.
Now honestly, my fellow students, what are we complaining about here? Some committee that will discuss certain options that we (and by "we" I mean the head of the SBU) do not approve of? Has anything concrete been done to academia to provoke this? No. Do we agree that something needs to be done about the state of academia in the country? Yes. So what are we striking about? That Mr. SBU President wasn't invited to take part. That is all it is, and don't let them tell you otherwise. At least this round they didn't hire bullies (with my money) to deny people such as myself, (false consciousnesses as we are often hatefully called) their right to enter the campus, a right which is protected by law, mind you. They know they can count on students not-showing up for anything they ever organize. After all, if it were actually a protest they wanted to arrange (which is what this legally is, as it is by no way a 'strike'), they could have done so, but they know nobody gives a shit, which leaves them powerless. One thing they know they can count on is students not-going to school if asked not too. A kneejerk reaction by the masses whomiss the fact that unlike highschool, they're actually paying good money for each and every one of their classes to take place.
Sigh, I really do want to end this rant, so I'll just admit that the only good thing about this is that I get to sleep more, which is of course, always a positive.


* The title of this post is an idea that's been running around in my brain that I'll eventually put into words, probably on my blog. As you can gather, it has to do witrh creativity. Hey, those who cannot do, teach, right?

Tough shit if you'd like to know more, because there's not much more I'm ready to say about it at this point. Think of it as Memetics on speed. And for dummies.


* Started reading Marcel Proust's Remembrance of things Past. Still not sold on it though. The pile next to my bed isn't getting any shorter, sigh.




(Post a new comment)


[info]idan_cohen
2007-04-16 10:40 pm UTC (link)
The use of big "in" words for philosophical purposes, as I seem to recall mentioning once before, makes me goddamn sad.

Unrelatedly, memetics on speed and for dummies sounds like a exciting time. Creativity as a narrative borrowing of concepts, tricks, textual ticks and themes; each idea fully formed stolen from everyone else? Excuse me if I am reaching from a five-word sentence.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]telecart
2007-04-16 11:15 pm UTC (link)
The use of big "in" words for philosophical purposes
Er, what?

Unrelatedly, memetics on speed and for dummies sounds like a exciting time.

I thought you might like it. Run with it, me'boy, run with it.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]idan_cohen
2007-04-16 11:36 pm UTC (link)
'Big In Words', henceforth defined as things like; "Roles of Analyticity: On the Synthetic-Analytic Distinction for Kant and others" and "...a Dennettian version of strong Materialistic Empiricism". Now, though I am usually a fan of big words, I dislike them when they are, as it were, exclusionary; let me expand. Exlusionary words are those that are easily understandble to anyone within the same frame of reference of the writer, and complete gibberish to anyone else.( A good example would be; "Oh, that's easy, all you need to do is defragment drive D and then reboot the kernel through the BIOS." )

Now, I admit that these types of big words are usually necessary in the disciplines they are used in; you can't learn engineering without having weird names for weird engineering actions. On the other hand, since philosiphy is in fact the study of life etc etc, then it should be completely accessible to all whom the study of life might interest, to wit everyone everywhere. For example, you have a person such as myself of a inward and outward studying bent with a tendency towards abstract thought, fully interested in the field of what some call 'philosiphy' and even with a wider-than-average reading of the classical texts on the matter. On the other hand, I have no idea what you're talking about when you start using big words.

This is the general thrust of my opinion on the matter.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Look it up, ya lazy bum
[info]telecart
2007-04-17 03:57 am UTC (link)
since philosophy is in fact the study of life etc etc, then it should be completely accessible to all whom the study of life might interest, to wit everyone everywhere.

Au contraire, mon fraire!
I imagine you are (at least somewhat) familiar with Plato's allegory of the cave?
Philosophy is not for the everyman; It is for those who, as the saying goes, love teh smrt. It is a difficult, weary, unforgiving, and thankless task, and in the end there are no answers. Wittgenstein says it's therapeutic, but he was a very troubled man, so go know.

Basically what I'm saying is this; It is a field like any other, and it requires precision, and precision requires terminology. Going back to early Wittgenstein for a bit, in the Tractatus he makes the bold claim that he has solved all the problems of philosophy; They are all problems that stem from misunderstanding or misuse of language. Now clearly we still have a discipline called philosophy, but there is something to be said about the need for exact terms. My paper is in fact just such a work exploring how different people employed the same term in different manners, which leads to confusion, in part, because they do not necessarily think they are using the terms differently. Case in point, does Frege prove Kant wrong in that Mathematics is Analytic-Apriori rather than Synthetic-Apriori as Kant claims? Difficult question, because (despite what he clearly states!) the sense of 'Analytic' for him is strikingly different than Kant's term. It is a problem of incommensurability, if you'll allow me to finish up with a big word :o)



(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Look it up, ya lazy bum
[info]idan_cohen
2007-04-17 01:12 pm UTC (link)
I respectfully disagree, sir! Philosiphy is and very much should be the task of the everyman, layman, and handyman - excepting plumbers, who are dumbasses.*

The fact that there is a terminology which can easily make short-cuts between veins of thought (Saying 'ontological' is shorter than saying 'Having to do with the nature of existence', though I think I would have a easier time pronouncing the latter) helps shorten these discussions as they go to ever higher levels - but it is my firm belief, sir, that all of these questions and possible answers that compromise philosiphy can and should be phrased within the language of the layman. It is, in my opinion, not a more 'difficult, weary, unforgiving, and thankless task' than, shall we say, living; and corresponds well to the latter. You will excuse me as I have any and all Dark Philosipher/Poet Hero Kings put against the wall.

*I am not sure what I have against plumbers.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Look it up, ya lazy bum
[info]telecart
2007-04-18 12:35 am UTC (link)
You, of course, are wrong.
Because I am right.
See?
Syllogisms and Tigers and Bears oh my!

(Reply to this) (Parent)

(Reply from suspended user)

[info]r1vethead
2007-04-17 02:13 am UTC (link)
If you disagree wiht the strike you should get involved in your student union and at least have a debate with them. Or at least publish your positon and the position of other like-minded students in a flyer and distribute it. Until that point, shouldn't you be in solidarity with the more working class students?

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]telecart
2007-04-17 03:14 am UTC (link)
I'm not sure on the exact statistics, but certainly less than 50% of the students in Israel belong to the Union, (probably a lot less) which to me means they represent no one but themselves. There'd be little point in debating the issue with them, as they are merely protecting their own self-interests.
A friend of mine started an online petition against them, but really, what's the point. It's not like they'll ever disband the damn thing.

The question of solidarity is complicated. Who says this strike is in their best interest? Perhaps they would be better off with whatever reforms this committee eventually decides upon? Who knows? I certainly don't. Neither do the SBU people. What I do know is that I'm sure as hell losing money along with the rest of the working class students on this so-called "strike".
it's fun not to go to school, but, again I must stress, we paid for the classes we're missing.

Besides, shouldn't working class students be in solidarity with working class students? Whats that to do with an elitist sycophant of the bourgeois like myself ? ;)

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]little_october
2007-04-23 04:06 pm UTC (link)
יום עצמאות שמח בייב.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]telecart
2007-04-23 06:50 pm UTC (link)
You too kiddo :)

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]little_october
2007-04-24 01:55 pm UTC (link)
מתי רואים אותך?

(Reply to this) (Parent)


Create an Account
Forgot your login?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…